I’d blogged before about my contact with the institute of textile technology in Aachen (ITA). On thursday, I was actually invited there for a preliminary talk with two of their engineers. The fundamental question is whether or not I want to write my diploma thesis at that institute. They are definitely interested in having me for the duration of the thesis, which is nine months.
First about the institute itself: They belong to mechanical engineering, and are staffed mostly by mech. engineers, barring a few construction engineers and one physicist. The institue is awash with company cash, because apparently they do a lot of work that business is seriously hot for. As a result, the institute employs over a hundred people total, while their nominal state funding would allow about a third of that. In short, they’re doing fabulously well from the economic point of view. But what do they do? Textile engineering sounds a little bit like crotcheting, but it’s not. Well, mostly not. They do deal with knitting, weaving and other methods of combining fibres. But for the most part, this is not directed towards clothing, but towards industrial and medical use of tissues. The two people I spoke with hailed from the groups for chemical fibre research and biomedical tissue engineering. The former tries to find new ways of creating fibres, so they don’t actually look for finished products. Instead, they try to perfect known processes and find entirely new ones. The latter group deals with implants and tissue growth. Several kinds of tissue can now be grown from donated cells special for each patient by implanting cells inside a textile scaffold. The cells multiply and slowly replace the scaffold with their natural tissue. A good example is laboratory skin growth for burn victims. Naturally, the tissue has to be medically safe, biologically suitable and of course easy and cheap to process. Other groups deal with different things yet, like textile-integrated electronics (one of their favourite showpieces is the sofa cushion with integrated remote – laundry-safe), or carbon inlays for airplane wings.
After the initial introduction, some of which I was already aware of, I talked a little bit about myself, what I knew already (quite a bit, but very little about textile engineering), what I could do in general skills and what hopes and doubts I had. We had a slight misunderstanding concerning my math skills – I said “the hard math stuff is not my forté”, which one of the engineers took to mean “I’m no good at math at all”. I am familiar with linear algebra, basic numerics, common differential equations, analysis and non-linear dynamics. Just not, you know, the hard stuff. Then we spoke a little bit about what possible topics I could do, and what the physicists before me had done. One of them had apparently set up his own model on polymeres to describe the stretching of polyacride. Excellent work, that. The initial possibilities seem to include simulation, machine experimentation and process control. A colleague of theirs, who will meet me some time in the coming week, wants to do a thesis on acoustic emission process control. Meaning basically that you stick a microphone to your machine and tell from that when something subtle is going wrong. The physics is all classical – no quantum anything. Nevertheless, it is decidedly non-trivial. I’m not at all sure yet that I can actually accomplish much.
That was the prevailing problem: Many of these processes are so fantastically complicated that simulation and modelling is tremendously difficult. I am only just beginning real scientific work, and still quite unskilled and unexperienced. I only have nine months for it, too. Many of the possible subjects have the potential to be ludicrously complicated, and the engineers are no experts at determining the feasibility of such modelling. If I decide to do my thesis there, I’ll have to be prepared for some fun physicist-engineer interaction. On the other hand, I am only too conscious of some of my own shortcomings regarding basic knowledge of economics and machine usage and construction.
In any case, I do not have to decide yet. The institute of laser technology is also still in the running, but has not yet responded to my request for a similar meeting. In doubt, the ILT would be a better match for my studies so far. The ITA might be newer and more exciting, though. It’s just so different; old and yet cool. I like that.


