Today was Mensa in Deutschland e.V. (MinD)’s main membership assembly. Of about 6,500 members, a good 400 had come to Hamburg to participate in this five hour session of the association’s supreme deciding body. We had a number of major points on the agenda, like
- hearing the financial reports for 2007
- exculpation of the board
- hearing the audit results for 2007
- electing a new board for two years
We also had a large number of motions, some concerned with changing the ordinance of the association. E.g., one particular one was concerned with banning clubs-inside-the-club, i.e., any member of MinD should have access to any subgroup. Most important, we had a motion for expulsion of a member, in fact, a member running to be member of the board. Expulsion at all is pretty rare, having happened only twice in the past 20 years, apparently.
We had some very, very intense discussions, structured by a number of immediate motions, like limitation of alloted time, closure of speaker list, and similar. I saw a lot of democracy in action. For someone as unacquainted with MinD as I am, it was a crash course in the internal politics and workings of the association. The financial report was interesting in so far as MinD grosses quite a lot more money than I had expected, and most importantly makes a profit from the IQ test business.
The board was exculped as expected. There was some bad blood about the audit, because the auditors had, by widespread opinion, overstepped their boundaries by commenting more on monetary policy than on conscienciousness and formal correctness of the books. The assembly passed a formal reprimand, but denied an external re-audit. A motion to strip the auditors of their position is gathering signatures, but will most likely fall short.
The expulsion motion was the main talking point, but I will not go into details for privacy’s sake. The motion was successful by large margin, however.
Most other motions failed. Among others the motion for access to all sub clubs mentioned above. Mostly because there are both kids’ and adults’ subgroups that depend on allowing access to a limited group of members only.
The program for the annual meeting 2009 in Munich was presented, and Dortmund was elected the place for 2010; the committee will now start planning for real.
Final thoughts: I learned a lot about the important people in MinD, I saw the base procedural and some of its weaknesses. In summary, MinD has quite a few people who are poor at taking criticism, communicating dissent curteously or just dealing with conflict in a reasonable manner. This is pretty much in accordance with its reputation, but most of those people can be dealt with and are in their way productive members. I am not without personality flaws, either, and I have yet to do much of anything for MinD. I think I’ll start by getting engaged my MHN, the student network that is not-quite-a-subgroup.